InDev Innovation Lab

CoverageLens.

See the gaps before they become problems.

An AI-powered assessment tool that gives development teams a standardized, visual view of how complete and balanced their planned test cases really are.

Instead of manually reviewing large test-case repositories, CoverageLens analyzes documented tests, classifies them by testing type, and identifies where additional testing may be needed.

coverage_map 2 gaps detected
68% Coverage index
FunctionalStrong
PositiveStrong
NegativeModerate
Edge CasesGap
508 / AccessibilityGap
Illustrative representation of a CoverageLens assessment.
The Differentiator

From Test Cases to Coverage Intelligence.

AI testing platforms increasingly help teams generate, execute, and manage tests. CoverageLens answers a question that comes earlier: before you execute, do you actually know what you've covered?

Traditional Review
01
Large test repositories
Thousands of rows across spreadsheets and tools.
02
Manual inspection
Sampling by hand, limited by time and reviewer.
03
Inconsistent interpretation
No shared definition of "enough" coverage.
04
Hidden gaps
Blind spots surface after release, not before.
Undifferentiated test inventory
→
CoverageLens
01
Test repository
Ingest documented cases as they already exist.
02
AI classification
Every case typed against a consistent taxonomy.
03
Coverage analysis
Breadth and balance measured across categories.
04
Actionable gaps
Named, ranked, and ready for the next sprint.
Classified, measured, gaps marked
The Process

How CoverageLens Works.

One continuous analytical pass — from raw test inventory to a ranked set of coverage gaps. Select a stage to see what it produces.

Stage 01

Analyze

test_cases.csv4,182 rows
TC-1041User submits benefits application with valid data
TC-1042Reject submission when SSN field is malformed
TC-1043Verify audit log entry after status change
TC-1044Confirm session timeout returns to sign-in
TC-1045Batch import handles duplicate case numbers
TC-1046Notification sent on eligibility determination
TC-1047Search returns paginated results
classification5 testing types
User submits application with valid dataPositive
Reject malformed SSN fieldNegative
Audit log entry after status changeFunctional
Batch import with duplicate case numbersEdge Case
No case found for screen-reader flow508 — none
distributionshare of cases
identified_gapsranked
Section 508 / AccessibilityGap
Recommend keyboard-only navigation and screen-reader announcement cases for the application flow.
Edge CasesGap
Recommend boundary cases for concurrent submissions and maximum-length field entries.
NegativeUnderrepresented
Error handling is covered for form input but not for downstream service failures.
Outcomes

Turn Coverage Into Confidence.

Find gaps

Spot missing tests for critical features, edge cases, or user flows before users do.

Reduce risk

Identify testing gaps that could allow security, performance, or core functionality issues to reach production.

Assessed 68%
2 categories at risk

Assure quality

Assess how prepared the delivery team is to validate that software meets both business rules and user expectations.

Attention now
Edge case coverage
Section 508 coverage
Sample Assessment

What CoverageLens Can Reveal.

Illustrative representation
Benefits Portal — Release 4.2 4,182 documented cases
Overall68%
Coverage by testing type
Coverage matrix — testing type × feature area Covered Thin Gap
Areas Requiring Attention
508 / AccessibilityHigh

Only 12 of 4,182 cases address assistive technology. No keyboard-only path is documented for the application flow.

Edge CasesElevated

Boundary conditions absent for concurrent submissions, maximum field lengths, and interrupted uploads.

NegativeWatch

Error handling is well covered at the form layer but thin for downstream service failures.

Suggested next tests
+Screen-reader announcement on eligibility result
+Concurrent submission by two authorized users
+Timeout during document upload
In Practice

Built for Real Delivery Scenarios.

With CoverageLens

InDev Innovation Lab

Better testing starts with knowing what you're missing.

CoverageLens turns test planning into something teams can see, assess, and improve — before gaps reach production.

5
Testing types classified
Minutes
To assess a full repository
ilab@indev.com
Start the conversation